Skip to content

Scientists Don’t Want to Get Scooped—and It’s Hurting Science

Scientists Don’t Want to Get Scooped—and It’s Hurting Science

BlueSky Thinking Summary

This article reveals how fear of getting scooped—having research ideas published by others first—is undermining scientific progress.

Drawing on surveys, interviews, and publication data, the authors demonstrate that academics often withhold new ideas or delay sharing findings to avoid being preempted.

This cautious pace undermines the purpose of open inquiry, slows collaboration, and leaves promising research unexplored.

Early career researchers are particularly affected, as they feel pressure to guard their work to secure publication credit before launching new projects.

The cumulative effect is a scientific ecosystem that values caution over creativity, impeding the flow of ideas across labs and disciplines.

The study highlights that protecting intellectual priority can paradoxically restrict innovation.

To counter this, the authors suggest creating norms that reward sharing—such as idea registries, transparent documentation, or community recognition systems.

Ultimately the article argues that rebalancing incentives toward openness could accelerate discovery and revitalize the collaborative spirit of science.