You worked hard to get here. The GMAT, the essays, the interviews, the waiting. And then the offer letter from the school you dreamed of, the programme that is the right bet on your future self.

The first weeks deliver on the promise. Your new MBA classmates are remarkable: the consultant who pivoted to social enterprise, the engineer who built something, the banker who wants to do something different with what she knows. The conversations run long over dinner. The professors are genuinely stimulating. For the first time in years, perhaps, you are thinking not about the next quarter or the next performance review, but about what kind of leader you want to be, what kind of organisation you want to build, what the next decade could actually look like.

Then the case studies start to stack up. Your first accounting exam arrives faster than expected. You signed up for three clubs in orientation week because all of them interest you and now all three have meetings on Thursday. The recruiting calendar has taken over your inbox with coffee chats, company presentations, and tailoring your CV. A classmate mentions they already have a first-round interview. The programme that felt, weeks ago, like an invitation to think bigger has begun to feel, on certain evenings, like the world’s most expensive to-do list

Nobody signed up for the treadmill. They signed up for the intellectual rush of learning something genuinely new, learning about yourself, the pleasure of being in a room full of smart, ambitious people who make you think differently, the rare permission to step off the career escalator and ask bigger questions. In the language of a striking new academic paper, they signed up for joy.

Joy, it turns out, is not a word that appears very often on business school websites. Transformation, yes. Leadership, constantly. Impact, inevitably. But joy? That sounds soft and unserious. Hard to quantify in a post-programme salary survey.

A new study published in the British Journal of Sociology of Education is pushing back against that instinct. Researchers at the University of Sheffield, led by Lauren White and Will Mason from the School of Education, argue that higher education has become so dominated by measurable outputs – grades, assessments, career-readiness metrics – that it has systematically crushed what drew many people to learning in the first place. Their solution is not a wellness programme or a mindfulness module. It is a fundamental rethinking of what education is for. They call it a “pedagogy of joy.”

The expected ROI of business school

The neoliberal marketisation of higher education has been dissected at length by academics for two decades. But White, Mason and their colleagues make a different kind of argument. They are less interested in the structural critique and more concerned with what this system does to people – the emotional and embodied cost it imposes on students and staff alike.

Drawing on co-produced research with 21 students at a Russell Group university, they found something that will resonate with anyone who has spent time in a demanding graduate programme: joy is rarely located in the formal curriculum. It lives in the after-class conversations, the study groups that turned into friendships, the elective that nobody counted on their transcript but everyone still talks about years later. The formal architecture of education, the researchers found, tends to crowd these moments out rather than cultivate them.

The MBA is perhaps the most explicitly transactional qualification in higher education. It carries a price tag, often a very high one. It comes with an expected ROI. Every school publishes the employment statistics; rankings track salary outcomes for three years post-graduation. The whole approach says loudly and clearly that this is an investment. Treat it as such.

For many students, especially those who have taken on loans and left careers behind, the MBA is very much a financial calculation. But when the investment logic comes to dominate every aspect of the experience, something gets lost. And what gets lost, the Sheffield researchers would argue, is precisely the conditions under which the most durable learning happens.

What Joy Actually Means for the MBA

It is worth being precise about the word, because “joy” in this context is not the same as happiness, pleasure, or the fleeting satisfaction of a good exam result. The researchers draw heavily on the philosopher and educator bell hooks, who argued for creating “spaces where learning is a process of collaboration, rather than just a predetermined output.” Joy, in this framework, is the experience of genuine intellectual engagement. It is the sense that learning is something happening to you and with you, not something you are processing as efficiently as possible on the way to a credential.

It is also relational. In the Sheffield study, students consistently located joy in connection – with each other, with ideas that surprised them, with the experience of being truly heard in a workshop rather than assessed. Joy requires safety: the safety to not know the answer, to voice a half-formed thought, to fail without it counting against you. It is, in that sense, the opposite of the high-stakes, performance-oriented environment that elite business schools often inadvertently create.

The cohort model, one of the MBA’s most celebrated features is a powerful vector for exactly this kind of joyful connection. Bring together 300 people from 60 countries, with 26 years of combined professional experience in every study group, and you have the raw ingredients for something genuinely extraordinary. But the cohort can also become a competitive arena, a networking transaction, a performance of confidence. The difference between those two outcomes is not accidental. It is a function of how the programme is designed, and whether joy is treated as a pedagogical priority or an accidental by-product.

The Intensity Trap

Business school is demanding, and deliberately so. The case method, at its best, is designed to put students in conditions of productive discomfort by simulating the time pressure and information ambiguity of real decision-making. The academic calendar of a full-time MBA packs more intellectual content into 10 or 21 months than most professionals encounter in a decade. There is a reason alumni describe the experience as transformational: it is genuinely intense and rewarding.

But there is a meaningful difference between productive intensity that stretches and grows you, and performative busyness, which exhausts you. And there is a growing body of evidence, from both educational psychology and management research, that the latter actively undermines the former. Cognitive overload compromises creative thinking. Chronic stress narrows the range of options people can see. And the pressure to perform, and to be seen to be performing kills the kind of exploratory, speculative thinking that the best business education is supposed to cultivate.

The Sheffield researchers put it plainly: “To move towards joy is not a frivolous act. It is a political and pedagogical choice to sit with the discomfort of our current systems and intentionally create spaces where learning is a process of collaboration, rather than just a predetermined output.”

A business school dean or programme director might reflect on which elements of the programme design are genuinely challenging students to grow, and which are simply making them busy? The two are not the same. A packed schedule of case studies, consulting projects, and recruiting events can look like richness while functioning as a form of intellectual crowding-out.

What a Joyful MBA Might Look Like

The Sheffield paper offers what it calls “Takeaway Tangibles”, practical principles for educators who want to move towards a more joyful pedagogy. Translated into the context of business education, they suggest some fairly specific interventions.

Recognising students as experts is one. MBA cohorts are full of people who have led teams, navigated crises, built products, and made consequential decisions. The best professors already know how to draw this out.

Making it safe to fail is essential. The MBA’s marketability creates an incentive for students to perform competence rather than risk genuine exploration. If every contribution is potentially being evaluated, you stop taking intellectual risks. The joy of discovery requires the freedom to be wrong, and business schools send mixed signals about whether that freedom actually exists.

Stanford GSB has maintained a strong culture of grade non-disclosure in the MBA, even in competitive employment areas like consulting, with employers forbidden from asking about grades and students from sharing them. The message is that taking risks is highly encouraged, so students may find themselves tackling subjects they have no prior knowledge or experience with. Students wanted to be able to experiment with different courses, including those outside their area of expertise, without being punished for it. This is the basis of intellectual courage, with the signal that learning matters more than scoring.

However, critics note that removing the grade signal can dampen motivation as much as it liberates curiosity, and that collaboration and competition coexist on most campuses regardless of disclosure policy. What matters, ultimately, is whether the culture – in the classroom, in how professors design discussion, in what the institution actually rewards -makes intellectual risk feel genuinely safe, or merely technically permissible.

Creating communities of learning matters too, to create the sense that you are thinking alongside people rather than competing against them. Some of the most powerful learning in any MBA programme happens in the late-night study sessions, the dinner table debates, the moments when a conversation with a classmate unlocks something a lecture never could. Designing for those moments, rather than treating them as incidental, is both possible and consequential.

Finally, the Sheffield researchers advocate for rest and slowness. “In order to enjoy learning,” they write, “we need to have time to rest, reflect and recuperate.” The packed MBA calendar is a feature in most programme design. But there is a growing recognition, supported by research in cognitive science and performance psychology, that reflection time is not wasted time. It is where the experience becomes wisdom rather than just information.

Transformation from the inside

The Sheffield researchers end their paper with a line that deserves attention.”Joy is where the light comes in.”

It is a claim, and a challenge. The claim is that joy, through the experience of genuine, collaborative, exploratory learning is not a luxury or a mood enhancement. It is where the most important things in education actually happen. The ROI of any MBA programme looks irresistible if in addition to career outcomes, financial rewards and a lifelong network it also brings joy.

The MBA promises transformation. Joy might be what transformation feels like from the inside.

Interested in this topic? You might also like…